Despite running afoul of the city’s zoning ordinances, Brann is steadfast in his refusal to dismantle flags and a sign that serve as a poignant tribute to those who made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty.

City leaders argue that the display exceeds the allowable limits for signage, sparking a debate over the balance between honoring heroes and adhering to zoning regulations. While the city contends that rules must be followed, Brann passionately insists that his display is an essential expression of gratitude and respect for law enforcement and military service members.

Undeterred by the zoning violation, Brann plans to navigate the bureaucratic channels by applying for a zoning variance. However, he makes it abundantly clear that even if his application faces rejection, he will stand resolute in preserving the memorial.

His unwavering commitment to honoring those who have given their lives in service to the community reflects a deep-seated belief in the importance of recognizing and appreciating the sacrifices made by these brave individuals.

Interestingly, amid the ongoing debate, Brann did opt to remove a pair of banners from the display. This decision followed complaints that the messaging on the banners was perceived as political and offensive to some members of the community. It highlights the delicate balance that individuals, especially business owners, must navigate when expressing their views and sentiments in a public space.